I'm on the same page on this. However, I feel personally that the term 'marriage' should be stricken from our constitution and left for religions to decide on their private terminology. The state/fed should only concern itself with the legal union of two people in one household for tax purposes. Leave us be!Jim
that's a fair point, Jim, and I am in favor of it happening. Eventually. But I don't want that to be a reaction to gay marriage, which is what it currently is. I want gay marriage to be legal before anyone starts talking about what you're talking about. It feels insulting, for reasons I can't quite express. Like we're still not good enough for their institution.
I'm on the same page on this. However, I feel personally that the term 'marriage' should be stricken from our constitution and left for religions to decide on their private terminology. The state/fed should only concern itself with the legal union of two people in one household for tax purposes. Leave us be!
ReplyDeleteJim
that's a fair point, Jim, and I am in favor of it happening. Eventually.
ReplyDeleteBut I don't want that to be a reaction to gay marriage, which is what it currently is. I want gay marriage to be legal before anyone starts talking about what you're talking about. It feels insulting, for reasons I can't quite express. Like we're still not good enough for their institution.